Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 311 L | 49 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 173x | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 376 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 209x | -102L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 376 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -102L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 311 L | - | 6.2x | 170x | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -167L |