Alfa Romeo 145 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Alfa Romeo 145 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 320 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.1 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 64 L
    • Max trunk load: 72 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 i.e. : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 i.e. : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V : 1.55 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4 i.e. : 39x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 39.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio : 38.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TD : 51.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 39.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 i.e. 320 L 27 L to 1 s 6.3x 237x -158L
    1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. 320 L 33 L to 1 s 6.3x 200x -158L
    1.4 i.e. 16V T.S. 320 L 30 L to 1 s 6.3x 234x -158L
    1.6 i.e. 320 L 30 L to 1 s 6.3x 201x -158L
    1.7 i.e. 16V 320 L 37 L to 1 s 6.3x 183x -158L
    2.0 16V Quadrifoglio 320 L 41 L to 1 s 6.3x 163x -158L
    1.9 TD 320 L 28 L to 1 s 6.3x 166x -158L
    2.0 16V T.S. 320 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 162x -158L
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e.
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 234x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 201x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V Quadrifoglio
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 166x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 162x
    Difference with world average -158L