Alfa Romeo 146 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Alfa Romeo 146 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
    • Max trunk load: 74 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.2 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 i 16V T.Spark : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i.e. : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio : 2.5 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 i 16V T.Spark : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i.e. : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. : 1.82 L/km-h (1.13 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. : 1.93 L/km-h (1.2 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 1.79 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4 i.e. : 45.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 i.e. 16V : 44.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TD : 55.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 46.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V T.S. : 46.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 i 16V T.Spark 380 L 35 L to 1 s 7.5x 277x -98L
    1.4 i.e. 380 L 31 L to 1 s 7.5x 281x -98L
    1.7 i.e. 16V 380 L 39 L to 1 s 7.5x 222x -98L
    1.7 i.e. 16V T.S. 380 L 43 L to 1 s 7.5x 218x -98L
    1.9 TD 380 L 36 L to 1 s 6.3x 197x -98L
    1.6 i.e. 380 L 35 L to 1 s 7.5x 238x -98L
    1.6 i.e. 16V T.S. 380 L 38 L to 1 s 7.5x 238x -98L
    2.0 16V Qudrifoglio 380 L 48 L to 1 s 6.2x 193x -98L
    2.0 16V T.S. 380 L 47 L to 1 s 6.2x 193x -98L
    Vehicle 1.4 i 16V T.Spark
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.4 i.e.
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 281x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.7 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e. 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V Qudrifoglio
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V T.S.
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L