Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 292 L | 29 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 183x | -186L |
1.9 JTD | 292 L | 25 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 153x | -186L |
2.0 | 292 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 148x | -186L |
1.9 16V JTD | 280 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 JTD | 292 L | - | 4.9x | 153x | -186L |
1.6 | 292 L | 29 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 183x | -186L |
2.0 | 292 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 148x | -186L |
1.9 16V JTD | 280 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i V6 24V | 280 L | 47 L to 1 s | 4.4x | 88x | -198L |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 88x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V T.Spark | 280 L | 32 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 142x | -198L |
1.6 i 16V | 280 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 175x | -198L |
1.6 i 16V T.Spark | 280 L | 28 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 175x | -198L |
1.9 JTD | 280 L | 30 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
1.9 16V JTD | 280 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
---|---|
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 280 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 175x | -198L |
1.9 16V JTD | 280 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
1.6 i 16V T.Spark | 280 L | 28 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 175x | -198L |
1.9 JTD | 280 L | 30 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 147x | -198L |
2.0 i 16V T.Spark | 280 L | 32 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 142x | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.9 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V T.Spark |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V T.Spark |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -198L |