Alfa Romeo 155 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Alfa Romeo 155 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 512 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 102.4 L
    • Max trunk load: 80 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.7 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • 1.8 T.Spark : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.7 T.Spark : 4.6 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TD : 5.8 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T.Spark : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.5 TD : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.5 V6 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V : 2.69 L/km-h (1.67 L/mph)
  • 1.8 T.Spark : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 1.7 T.Spark : 2.75 L/km-h (1.71 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V : 1.82 L/km-h (1.13 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TD : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T.Spark : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 2.5 TD : 2.69 L/km-h (1.67 L/mph)
  • 2.5 V6 : 2.44 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 T.Spark 16V : 67.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 T.Spark : 66.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 T.Spark : 64.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V : 41.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TD : 73.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T.Spark : 65.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T.Spark 16V : 63.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 TD : 73.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 V6 : 55.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 T.Spark 16V 525 L 49 L to 1 s 8.3x 329x +47L
    1.8 T.Spark 525 L 55 L to 1 s 8.3x 301x +47L
    1.7 T.Spark 525 L 47 L to 1 s 8.3x 300x +47L
    2.0 Turbo Q4 16V 410 L 61 L to 1 s 6.8x 206x -68L
    2.0 TD 525 L 41 L to 1 s 8.3x 272x +47L
    2.0 T.Spark 525 L 60 L to 1 s 8.3x 263x +47L
    2.0 T.Spark 16V 525 L 66 L to 1 s 8.3x 266x +47L
    2.5 TD 525 L 53 L to 1 s 8.3x 210x +47L
    2.5 V6 525 L 66 L to 1 s 8.3x 211x +47L
    Vehicle 1.6 T.Spark 16V
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 329x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 1.8 T.Spark
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 1.7 T.Spark
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo Q4 16V
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 206x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 272x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 2.0 T.Spark
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 263x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 2.0 T.Spark 16V
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 266x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average +47L
    Vehicle 2.5 V6
    Trunk space 525 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 211x
    Difference with world average +47L