Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 | 105 L | - | 2.6x | 60x | -373L |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 105 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -373L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 | 110 L | 26 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 63x | -368L |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 110 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 63x |
Difference with world average | -368L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 | 110 L | 26 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 63x | -368L |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 110 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 63x |
Difference with world average | -368L |