Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 JTD | 350 L | 36 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 219x | -128L |
1.4 TB | 350 L | 39 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 256x | -128L |
2.0 JTD | 350 L | 44 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 179x | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.6 JTD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TB |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTD |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TB MultiAir | 350 L | 47 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 256x | -128L |
1.6 JTDM | 350 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 219x | -128L |
1.750 TB | 350 L | 54 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 201x | -128L |
1.4 TB | 350 L | 39 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 256x | -128L |
2.0 JTDM | 350 L | 42 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 179x | -128L |
1.4 | 350 L | 36 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 256x | -128L |
1.4 MultiAir | 350 L | 48 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 256x | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TB MultiAir |
---|---|
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.6 JTDM |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.750 TB |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TB |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTDM |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 1.4 MultiAir |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -128L |