Alfa Romeo Spider Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Alfa Romeo Spider trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 253 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 2.5 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 126.5 L
    • Max trunk load: 96 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.2 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2 JTS : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • 2.4 JTDM 20V : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 3.2 V6 Q4 : 1 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2 JTS : 1.17 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • 2.4 JTDM 20V : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • 3.2 V6 Q4 : 1.05 L/km-h (0.65 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2 JTS : 26.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 JTDM 20V : 32x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 V6 Q4 : 20.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2 JTS 253 L 30 L to 1 s 3.6x 115x -225L
    2.4 JTDM 20V 253 L 31 L to 1 s 3.6x 115x -225L
    3.2 V6 Q4 253 L 38 L to 1 s 3.6x 79x -225L
    Vehicle 2.2 JTS
    Trunk space 253 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 115x
    Difference with world average -225L
    Vehicle 2.4 JTDM 20V
    Trunk space 253 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 115x
    Difference with world average -225L
    Vehicle 3.2 V6 Q4
    Trunk space 253 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 79x
    Difference with world average -225L

    Quick notes on Alfa Romeo Spider trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 119 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 2.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 1.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 59.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 84 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V T.Spark : 0.8 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V T.Spark : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V T.Spark : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i V6 TB : 0.6 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 JTS : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • 3.2 i V6 24V : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 i 16V T.Spark : 0.54 L/km-h (0.34 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V T.Spark : 0.52 L/km-h (0.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V T.Spark : 0.52 L/km-h (0.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i V6 TB : 0.48 L/km-h (0.3 L/mph)
  • 2.0 JTS : 0.51 L/km-h (0.32 L/mph)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V : 0.63 L/km-h (0.39 L/mph)
  • 3.2 i V6 24V : 0.61 L/km-h (0.38 L/mph)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 0.49 L/km-h (0.3 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V T.Spark : 12x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 JTS : 12x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 i V6 24V : 11.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 11.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 i 16V T.Spark 110 L 13 L to 1 s 1.6x 63x -368L
    2.0 i 16V T.Spark 110 L 14 L to 1 s 1.6x 56x -368L
    2.0i 16V T.Spark 110 L 14 L to 1 s 1.6x 56x -368L
    2.0 i V6 TB 110 L 15 L to 1 s 1.6x 55x -368L
    2.0 JTS 110 L 14 L to 1 s 1.6x 56x -368L
    3.0 i V6 24V 147 L 23 L to 1 s 2.1x 50x -331L
    3.2 i V6 24V 147 L 24 L to 1 s 2.1x 46x -331L
    3.0 i V6 110 L 16 L to 1 s 1.6x 37x -368L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V T.Spark
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 13 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 63x
    Difference with world average -368L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V T.Spark
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 56x
    Difference with world average -368L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V T.Spark
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 56x
    Difference with world average -368L
    Vehicle 2.0 i V6 TB
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 55x
    Difference with world average -368L
    Vehicle 2.0 JTS
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 56x
    Difference with world average -368L
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 147 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 50x
    Difference with world average -331L
    Vehicle 3.2 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 147 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 46x
    Difference with world average -331L
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Trunk space 110 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 37x
    Difference with world average -368L

    Quick notes on Alfa Romeo Spider trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 150 L
      • Max trunk load: 76 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2000 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 1600 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 2000 Veloce : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2000 : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • 1600 : 1.67 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 2000 Veloce : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1600 : 30.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2000 300 L 30 L to 1 s 6.5x 153x -178L
    1600 300 L 28 L to 1 s 6.5x 191x -178L
    2000 Veloce 300 L 34 L to 1 s 6.5x 153x -178L
    Vehicle 2000
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 153x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle 1600
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 191x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle 2000 Veloce
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 153x
    Difference with world average -178L