Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 BiTurbo | 530 L | 161 L to 1 s | 8x | 121x | +52L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 BiTurbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 161 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 121x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 BiTurbo | 570 L | 168 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 130x | +92L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 BiTurbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 570 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 168 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | +92L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 | 520 L | 130 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 118x | +42L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 130 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 | 560 L | 140 L to 1 s | 8x | 127x | +82L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 140 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 | 520 L | 121 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 118x | +42L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 121 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 | 560 L | 127 L to 1 s | 8x | 127x | +82L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 127 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 i | 500 L | 109 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 114x | +22L |
4.4 V8 | 500 L | 114 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 114x | +22L |
Vehicle | 4.4 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 109 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 114x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 114 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 114x |
Difference with world average | +22L |