cat_logo
HomeAudi

90

Audi 90 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Audi 90 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 383 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.5 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76.6 L
    • Max trunk load: 72 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.3 E 20V : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E CAT : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2.3 E CAT : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.3 E : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E 20V : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TD : 5.2 L/hp (7.1 L/kW)
  • 2.2 E : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.3 E 20V : 1.44 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E CAT : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.3 E CAT : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • 2.3 E : 1.55 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E 20V : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 1.6 TD : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 2.2 E : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.3 E 20V : 31.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E CAT : 51.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 E CAT : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 E : 36.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E 20V : 42.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E : 48.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 TD : 78.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 E : 32.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.3 E 20V 313 L 39 L to 1 s 4.5x 136x -165L
    2.0 E CAT 425 L 46 L to 1 s 6.3x 213x -53L
    2.3 E CAT 425 L 50 L to 1 s 6.1x 184x -53L
    2.3 E 320 L 37 L to 1 s 4.6x 139x -158L
    2.0 E 20V 425 L 51 L to 1 s 6.1x 213x -53L
    2.0 E 425 L 46 L to 1 s 6.3x 213x -53L
    1.6 TD 418 L 30 L to 1 s 6.1x 263x -60L
    2.2 E 313 L 37 L to 1 s 4.5x 141x -165L
    Vehicle 2.3 E 20V
    Trunk space 313 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average -165L
    Vehicle 2.0 E CAT
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.3 E CAT
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 184x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.3 E
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 139x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 2.0 E 20V
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 1.6 TD
    Trunk space 418 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 263x
    Difference with world average -60L
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Trunk space 313 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 141x
    Difference with world average -165L

    Quick notes on Audi 90 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 496 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 99.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 68 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.2 E : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 CAT : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • 2.2 E : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • 2.2 CAT : 2.39 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 : 62.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 E : 46x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E : 62.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 CAT : 43.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 541 L 60 L to 1 s 8x 271x +63L
    2.2 E 451 L 52 L to 1 s 6.4x 203x -27L
    2.0 E 541 L 60 L to 1 s 8x 271x +63L
    2.2 CAT 451 L 50 L to 1 s 6.4x 203x -27L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 541 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +63L
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Trunk space 451 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -27L
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Trunk space 541 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +63L
    Vehicle 2.2 CAT
    Trunk space 451 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -27L