Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 TFSI V8 | 565 L | 166 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 141x | +87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 565 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 166 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | +87L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 TFSI V8 performance | 565 L | 161 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 141x | +87L |
4.0 TFSI | 565 L | 153 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 141x | +87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI V8 performance |
---|---|
Trunk space | 565 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 161 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | +87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 TFSI |
Trunk space | 565 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 153 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | +87L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 TFSI V10 | 546 L | 127 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 109x | +68L |
Vehicle | 5.0 TFSI V10 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 546 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 127 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | +68L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 TFSI V10 | 565 L | 128 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 113x | +87L |
Vehicle | 5.0 TFSI V10 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 565 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 128 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | +87L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 BiTurbo V8 | 424 L | 90 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 102x | -54L |
Vehicle | 4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 424 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 102x |
Difference with world average | -54L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 BiTurbo V8 | 455 L | 97 L to 1 s | 5.5x | 109x | -23L |
Vehicle | 4.2 BiTurbo V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 97 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -23L |