Bentley Continental Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 358 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89.5 L
    • Max trunk load: 132 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.6 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.0 TSI W12 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • 4.0 V8 : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.0 TSI W12 : 1.08 L/km-h (0.67 L/mph)
  • 4.0 V8 : 1.13 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.0 TSI W12 358 L 102 L to 1 s 4x 60x -120L
    4.0 V8 358 L 94 L to 1 s 4x 90x -120L
    Vehicle 6.0 TSI W12
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 102 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 60x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle 4.0 V8
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 90x
    Difference with world average -120L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 235 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 58.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 142 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.0 TSI W12 : 0.4 L/hp (0.5 L/kW)
  • 4.0 V8 : 0.4 L/hp (0.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.0 TSI W12 : 0.71 L/km-h (0.44 L/mph)
  • 4.0 V8 : 0.74 L/km-h (0.46 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 6.0 TSI W12 : 19x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.0 V8 : 20.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.0 TSI W12 235 L 65 L to 1 s 2.6x 39x -243L
    4.0 V8 235 L 60 L to 1 s 2.6x 59x -243L
    Vehicle 6.0 TSI W12
    Trunk space 235 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 39x
    Difference with world average -243L
    Vehicle 4.0 V8
    Trunk space 235 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 59x
    Difference with world average -243L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 358 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 137 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.0 W12 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • V8 4.0 : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • Speed 6.0 W12 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • GT3-R 4.0 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.0 W12 : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • V8 4.0 : 1.17 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 1.16 L/km-h (0.72 L/mph)
  • Speed 6.0 W12 : 1.08 L/km-h (0.67 L/mph)
  • GT3-R 4.0 : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 1.07 L/km-h (0.66 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 6.0 W12 : 25.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • V8 4.0 : 33.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 33.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Speed 6.0 W12 : 24.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • GT3-R 4.0 : 28.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 22.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.0 W12 358 L 83 L to 1 s 4x 60x -120L
    V8 4.0 358 L 78 L to 1 s 4x 90x -120L
    V8 S 4.0 358 L 83 L to 1 s 4x 90x -120L
    Speed 6.0 W12 358 L 90 L to 1 s 4x 60x -120L
    GT3-R 4.0 358 L 102 L to 1 s 4x 90x -120L
    Supersport 6.0 W12 358 L 53 L to 1 s 4x 60x -120L
    Vehicle 6.0 W12
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 83 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 60x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle V8 4.0
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 90x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle V8 S 4.0
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 83 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 90x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle Speed 6.0 W12
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 60x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle GT3-R 4.0
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 102 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 90x
    Difference with world average -120L
    Vehicle Supersport 6.0 W12
    Trunk space 358 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 60x
    Difference with world average -120L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 260 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 65 L
      • Max trunk load: 149 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.0 W12 : 0.4 L/hp (0.6 L/kW)
  • V8 4.0 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • Speed 6.0 : 0.4 L/hp (0.6 L/kW)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 0.4 L/hp (0.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.0 W12 : 0.83 L/km-h (0.52 L/mph)
  • V8 4.0 : 0.86 L/km-h (0.53 L/mph)
  • Speed 6.0 : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 0.84 L/km-h (0.52 L/mph)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 0.79 L/km-h (0.49 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 6.0 W12 : 18.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • V8 4.0 : 23.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Speed 6.0 : 17.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • V8 S 4.0 : 23.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Supersport 6.0 W12 : 16.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.0 W12 260 L 58 L to 1 s 2.9x 43x -218L
    V8 4.0 260 L 54 L to 1 s 2.9x 65x -218L
    Speed 6.0 260 L 62 L to 1 s 2.9x 43x -218L
    V8 S 4.0 260 L 58 L to 1 s 2.9x 65x -218L
    Supersport 6.0 W12 260 L 34 L to 1 s 2.9x 43x -218L
    Vehicle 6.0 W12
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 43x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle V8 4.0
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 65x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Speed 6.0
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 43x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle V8 S 4.0
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 65x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Supersport 6.0 W12
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 43x
    Difference with world average -218L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 475 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 95 L
      • Max trunk load: 148 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.0 i W12 48V : 0.8 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • Speed 6.0i W12 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.0 i W12 48V : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • Speed 6.0i W12 : 1.48 L/km-h (0.92 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.0 i W12 48V 475 L 97 L to 1 s 5.3x 79x -3L
    Speed 6.0i W12 475 L 103 L to 1 s 5.3x 79x -3L
    Vehicle 6.0 i W12 48V
    Trunk space 475 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 97 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 79x
    Difference with world average -3L
    Vehicle Speed 6.0i W12
    Trunk space 475 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 103 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 79x
    Difference with world average -3L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 370 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 141 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo : 1.13 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo : 22.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo 370 L 86 L to 1 s 4.1x 62x -108L
    Vehicle Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
    Trunk space 370 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 86 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 62x
    Difference with world average -108L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 350 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 87.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 147 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.8 i V8 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.8 i V8 : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.8 i V8 350 L 63 L to 1 s 3.2x 52x -128L
    Vehicle 6.8 i V8
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 52x
    Difference with world average -128L

    Quick notes on Bentley Continental trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 349 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 87.3 L
      • Max trunk load: 149 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 6.7 i V8 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 6.7 i V8 Mulliner : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 6.7 V8 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 6.8 i V8 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 6.7 i V8 : 1.39 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • 6.7 i V8 Mulliner : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
  • 6.7 V8 : 1.42 L/km-h (0.88 L/mph)
  • 6.8 i V8 : 1.41 L/km-h (0.88 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 6.7 V8 : 18.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    6.7 i V8 347 L 57 L to 1 s 3.2x 51x -131L
    6.7 i V8 Mulliner 350 L 61 L to 1 s 3.5x 52x -128L
    6.7 V8 347 L 58 L to 1 s 3.2x 51x -131L
    6.8 i V8 350 L - 3.2x 52x -128L
    Vehicle 6.7 i V8
    Trunk space 347 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 51x
    Difference with world average -131L
    Vehicle 6.7 i V8 Mulliner
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 52x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle 6.7 V8
    Trunk space 347 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 51x
    Difference with world average -131L
    Vehicle 6.8 i V8
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 3.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 52x
    Difference with world average -128L