Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 TSI W12 | 358 L | 102 L to 1 s | 4x | 60x | -120L |
4.0 V8 | 358 L | 94 L to 1 s | 4x | 90x | -120L |
Vehicle | 6.0 TSI W12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V8 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 TSI W12 | 235 L | 65 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 39x | -243L |
4.0 V8 | 235 L | 60 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 59x | -243L |
Vehicle | 6.0 TSI W12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 235 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 39x |
Difference with world average | -243L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V8 |
Trunk space | 235 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -243L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 W12 | 358 L | 83 L to 1 s | 4x | 60x | -120L |
V8 4.0 | 358 L | 78 L to 1 s | 4x | 90x | -120L |
V8 S 4.0 | 358 L | 83 L to 1 s | 4x | 90x | -120L |
Speed 6.0 W12 | 358 L | 90 L to 1 s | 4x | 60x | -120L |
GT3-R 4.0 | 358 L | 102 L to 1 s | 4x | 90x | -120L |
Supersport 6.0 W12 | 358 L | 53 L to 1 s | 4x | 60x | -120L |
Vehicle | 6.0 W12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | V8 4.0 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | V8 S 4.0 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | Speed 6.0 W12 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | GT3-R 4.0 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | Supersport 6.0 W12 |
Trunk space | 358 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -120L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 W12 | 260 L | 58 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 43x | -218L |
V8 4.0 | 260 L | 54 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 65x | -218L |
Speed 6.0 | 260 L | 62 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 43x | -218L |
V8 S 4.0 | 260 L | 58 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 65x | -218L |
Supersport 6.0 W12 | 260 L | 34 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 43x | -218L |
Vehicle | 6.0 W12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 43x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | V8 4.0 |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 65x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | Speed 6.0 |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 43x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | V8 S 4.0 |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 65x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | Supersport 6.0 W12 |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 43x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 i W12 48V | 475 L | 97 L to 1 s | 5.3x | 79x | -3L |
Speed 6.0i W12 | 475 L | 103 L to 1 s | 5.3x | 79x | -3L |
Vehicle | 6.0 i W12 48V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 97 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 79x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Speed 6.0i W12 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 79x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo | 370 L | 86 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 62x | -108L |
Vehicle | Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 86 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 62x |
Difference with world average | -108L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.8 i V8 | 350 L | 63 L to 1 s | 3.2x | 52x | -128L |
Vehicle | 6.8 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 52x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 i V8 | 347 L | 57 L to 1 s | 3.2x | 51x | -131L |
6.7 i V8 Mulliner | 350 L | 61 L to 1 s | 3.5x | 52x | -128L |
6.7 V8 | 347 L | 58 L to 1 s | 3.2x | 51x | -131L |
6.8 i V8 | 350 L | - | 3.2x | 52x | -128L |
Vehicle | 6.7 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 347 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 51x |
Difference with world average | -131L |
Vehicle | 6.7 i V8 Mulliner |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 52x |
Difference with world average | -128L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V8 |
Trunk space | 347 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 51x |
Difference with world average | -131L |
Vehicle | 6.8 i V8 |
Trunk space | 350 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 52x |
Difference with world average | -128L |