cat_logo
HomeBmw

2-series

BMW 2 Series Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 408 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.1 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 81.6 L
    • Max trunk load: 91 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 218i : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • M235i : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • 220d : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 228i : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 218i : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • M235i : 1.72 L/km-h (1.07 L/mph)
  • 220d : 1.83 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 228i : 1.63 L/km-h (1.01 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 218i : 86x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • M235i : 64.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 102.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    218i 430 L 52 L to 1 s 10.2x 287x -48L
    M235i 430 L 91 L to 1 s 8.6x 215x -48L
    220d 430 L 61 L to 1 s 8.6x 216x -48L
    228i 340 L - 6.8x 170x -138L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 287x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle M235i
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 91 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 215x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 228i
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -138L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 460 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92 L
      • Max trunk load: 89 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 216i : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)
  • 218i : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 225i : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 220i : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 218d : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 225xe : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 216d : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • 220d : 2.5 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 216i : 2.46 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 218i : 2.28 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 225i : 1.99 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 220i : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 218d : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 225xe : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)
  • 216d : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 220d : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 216i : 80.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 80.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225i : 76.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 83.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 99.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225xe : 190.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 216d : 108.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 99.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    216i 468 L 44 L to 1 s 9.2x 312x -10L
    218i 468 L 53 L to 1 s 9.2x 312x -10L
    225i 468 L 78 L to 1 s 9.2x 234x -10L
    220i 468 L 67 L to 1 s 9.2x 234x -10L
    218d 468 L 54 L to 1 s 9.2x 235x -10L
    225xe 400 L 63 L to 1 s 11.1x 267x -78L
    216d 468 L 45 L to 1 s 9.2x 313x -10L
    220d 468 L 61 L to 1 s 9.2x 235x -10L
    Vehicle 216i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 312x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 312x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 225i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 234x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 234x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 225xe
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 267x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 216d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 313x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average -10L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 645 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 129 L
      • Max trunk load: 91 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 216i : 5.9 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)
  • 218i : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • 220i : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 216d : 5.6 L/hp (7.6 L/kW)
  • 218d : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)
  • 220d : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 216i : 3.43 L/km-h (2.13 L/mph)
  • 218i : 3.15 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 220i : 2.91 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 216d : 3.36 L/km-h (2.09 L/mph)
  • 218d : 3.15 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 220d : 2.96 L/km-h (1.84 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 216i : 109.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 107.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 105.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 216d : 146.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 134.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 134.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    216i 645 L 58 L to 1 s 12.6x 430x +167L
    218i 645 L 69 L to 1 s 12.6x 430x +167L
    220i 645 L 90 L to 1 s 12.6x 323x +167L
    216d 645 L 59 L to 1 s 12.6x 431x +167L
    218d 645 L 72 L to 1 s 12.6x 323x +167L
    220d 645 L 87 L to 1 s 12.6x 323x +167L
    Vehicle 216i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 216d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 431x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 390 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 97.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 86 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • M240i : 1.1 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 218i : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 230i : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 220i : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 218d : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 220d : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 225d : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • M240i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 218i : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 230i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 220i : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 218d : 1.83 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 220d : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 225d : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • M240i : 52.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 76.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 230i : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 70.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 97.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 90.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225d : 90.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    M240i 390 L 93 L to 1 s 7.5x 130x -88L
    218i 390 L 46 L to 1 s 7.5x 260x -88L
    230i 390 L 74 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    220i 390 L 57 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    218d 390 L 49 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    220d 390 L 59 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    225d 390 L 66 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    Vehicle M240i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 93 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 230i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 225d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 280 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 70 L
      • Max trunk load: 93 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 220d : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 218i : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 220i : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • M240i : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 218d : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 225d : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 230i : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 220d : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • 218i : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • 220i : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • M240i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • 218d : 1.37 L/km-h (0.85 L/mph)
  • 225d : 1.19 L/km-h (0.74 L/mph)
  • 230i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 220d : 63.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 50.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 48.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • M240i : 33.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 68.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225d : 60.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 230i : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    220d 280 L 39 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    218i 280 L 31 L to 1 s 5.4x 187x -198L
    220i 280 L 38 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    M240i 280 L 60 L to 1 s 5.4x 93x -198L
    218d 280 L 34 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    225d 280 L 46 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    230i 280 L 50 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 187x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle M240i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 93x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 225d
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 230i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 280 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 70 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • M235i : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 218i : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 228i : 1.1 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 220i : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 220d : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • M240i : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 230i : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • M235i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • 218i : 1.37 L/km-h (0.85 L/mph)
  • 228i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • 220i : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • 220d : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • M240i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • 230i : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • M235i : 35.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 52.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 228i : 42.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 49.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 68.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • M240i : 33.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 230i : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    M235i 280 L 58 L to 1 s 5.4x 94x -198L
    218i 280 L 31 L to 1 s 5.4x 187x -198L
    228i 280 L 49 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    220i 280 L 38 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    220d 280 L 40 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    M240i 280 L 60 L to 1 s 5.4x 93x -198L
    230i 280 L 50 L to 1 s 5.4x 140x -198L
    Vehicle M235i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 187x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 228i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle M240i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 93x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 230i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -198L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 645 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 129 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 218i : 4.7 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 220i : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 216d : 5.6 L/hp (7.6 L/kW)
  • 218d : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)
  • 220d : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 216i : 6.3 L/hp (8.6 L/kW)
  • 214d : 6.8 L/hp (9.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 218i : 3.18 L/km-h (1.98 L/mph)
  • 220i : 2.91 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 216d : 3.36 L/km-h (2.09 L/mph)
  • 218d : 3.15 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 220d : 2.93 L/km-h (1.82 L/mph)
  • 216i : 3.49 L/km-h (2.17 L/mph)
  • 214d : 3.58 L/km-h (2.22 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 218i : 124x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 109.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 216d : 161.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 137.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 146.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 216i : 121.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 214d : 165.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    218i 645 L 72 L to 1 s 12.6x 430x +167L
    220i 645 L 90 L to 1 s 10.6x 323x +167L
    216d 645 L 62 L to 1 s 12.6x 431x +167L
    218d 645 L 75 L to 1 s 12.6x 323x +167L
    220d 645 L 87 L to 1 s 12.6x 323x +167L
    216i 645 L 57 L to 1 s 12.6x 430x +167L
    214d 645 L 50 L to 1 s 12.6x 431x +167L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 216d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 431x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 323x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 216i
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average +167L
    Vehicle 214d
    Trunk space 645 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 431x
    Difference with world average +167L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 390 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 97.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 85 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 218i : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 220d : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 225d : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 218d : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • M240i : 1.1 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 220i : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 230i : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • M235i : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 228i : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 218i : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 220d : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 225d : 1.61 L/km-h (1 L/mph)
  • 218d : 1.83 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • M240i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 220i : 1.66 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 230i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • M235i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 228i : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 218i : 76.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 86.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225d : 83x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 92.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • M240i : 54.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 63.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 230i : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • M235i : 50x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 228i : 61.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    218i 390 L 46 L to 1 s 7.5x 260x -88L
    220d 390 L 57 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    225d 390 L 65 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    218d 390 L 48 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    M240i 390 L 89 L to 1 s 7.5x 130x -88L
    220i 390 L 58 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    230i 390 L 74 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    M235i 390 L 89 L to 1 s 7.5x 131x -88L
    228i 390 L 72 L to 1 s 7.5x 195x -88L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 225d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle M240i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 230i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle M235i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 131x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 228i
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average -88L

    Quick notes on BMW 2 Series trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 460 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 214d : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 225xe : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 218i : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 218d : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 225i : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 220d : 2.5 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 216d : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • 220i : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 214d : 2.53 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 225xe : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)
  • 218i : 2.28 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 218d : 2.23 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 225i : 1.97 L/km-h (1.22 L/mph)
  • 220d : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 216d : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 220i : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 214d : 123.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225xe : 190.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218i : 91.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 218d : 114.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 225i : 73.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220d : 101.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 216d : 123.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 220i : 83.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    214d 468 L 38 L to 1 s 9.2x 313x -10L
    225xe 400 L 63 L to 1 s 11.1x 267x -78L
    218i 468 L 54 L to 1 s 9.2x 312x -10L
    218d 468 L 55 L to 1 s 9.2x 235x -10L
    225i 468 L 78 L to 1 s 9.2x 234x -10L
    220d 468 L 68 L to 1 s 9.2x 235x -10L
    216d 468 L 46 L to 1 s 9.2x 313x -10L
    220i 468 L 67 L to 1 s 9.2x 234x -10L
    Vehicle 214d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 313x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 225xe
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 267x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 218i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 312x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 218d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 225i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 234x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 220d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 216d
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 313x
    Difference with world average -10L
    Vehicle 220i
    Trunk space 468 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 234x
    Difference with world average -10L