Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16d | 505 L | 46 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 338x | +27L |
25d | 505 L | 80 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
25i | 505 L | 81 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
18d | 505 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
20d | 505 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
18i | 505 L | 55 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 337x | +27L |
20i | 505 L | 72 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
25e | 450 L | 68 L to 1 s | 12.5x | 300x | -28L |
Vehicle | 16d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 338x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 25d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 25i |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 18d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 20d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 18i |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 337x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 20i |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 25e |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25i | 505 L | 80 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 253x | +27L |
25d | 505 L | 80 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
20d | 505 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
18d | 505 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 253x | +27L |
20i | 505 L | 67 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 253x | +27L |
16d | 505 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 338x | +27L |
18i | 505 L | 55 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 337x | +27L |
Vehicle | 25i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 25d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 20d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 18d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 20i |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 16d |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 338x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 18i |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 337x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18Li | 505 L | 51 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 337x | +27L |
20Li | 505 L | 66 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 253x | +27L |
25Le | 445 L | 64 L to 1 s | 12.7x | 297x | -33L |
Vehicle | 18Li |
---|---|
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 337x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 20Li |
Trunk space | 505 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +27L |
Vehicle | 25Le |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 297x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20i | 420 L | 56 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 210x | -58L |
18i | 420 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 211x | -58L |
28i | 420 L | 69 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 210x | -58L |
16d | 420 L | 39 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 211x | -58L |
18d | 420 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 211x | -58L |
20d | 420 L | 58 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 211x | -58L |
25d | 420 L | 66 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 211x | -58L |
Vehicle | 20i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 18i |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 28i |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 16d |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 18d |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 20d |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 25d |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
28i | 420 L | - | - | 140x | -58L |
Vehicle | 28i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -58L |