Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 545 L | - | 9.1x | 275x | +67L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 545 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +67L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 545 L | - | 9.1x | 275x | +67L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 545 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +67L |