Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 i 16V | 374 L | - | 6.4x | 165x | -104L |
3.1 i V6 | 374 L | - | 6.4x | 119x | -104L |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 374 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -104L |
Vehicle | 3.1 i V6 |
Trunk space | 374 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 119x |
Difference with world average | -104L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.1 i V6 | 379 L | - | 7.3x | 121x | -99L |
Vehicle | 3.1 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 379 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 121x |
Difference with world average | -99L |