Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.9 V6 12V | 762 L | - | 8x | 196x | +284L |
3.5 i V6 2WD | 915 L | 87 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 262x | +437L |
3.5 i V6 4WD | 915 L | 87 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 262x | +437L |
Vehicle | 3.9 V6 12V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 762 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | +284L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 2WD |
Trunk space | 915 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 262x |
Difference with world average | +437L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 4WD |
Trunk space | 915 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 262x |
Difference with world average | +437L |