Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 32V DHS | 495 L | 69 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 108x | +17L |
4.6 i V8 32V DTS | 495 L | 72 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 108x | +17L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V DHS |
---|---|
Trunk space | 495 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 108x |
Difference with world average | +17L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V DTS |
Trunk space | 495 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 108x |
Difference with world average | +17L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 24V Concours | 566 L | - | 8.3x | 124x | +88L |
4.6 i V8 32V Concours | 565 L | 80 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 124x | +87L |
4.9 i V8 | 566 L | - | 8.3x | 116x | +88L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V Concours |
---|---|
Trunk space | 566 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | +88L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V Concours |
Trunk space | 565 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | +87L |
Vehicle | 4.9 i V8 |
Trunk space | 566 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | +88L |