Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 | 392 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 167x | -86L |
2.0 | 392 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 196x | -86L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 392 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | -86L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 392 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -86L |