Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 502 L | 40 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 408x | +24L |
1.4 16V | 502 L | 43 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 359x | +24L |
1.6 16V | 502 L | 47 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 314x | +24L |
1.3D | 502 L | 37 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 402x | +24L |
1.4 | 502 L | 40 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 359x | +24L |
1.6 | 502 L | 45 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 314x | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 408x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 314x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.3D |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 402x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 314x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 290 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 236x | -188L |
1.4 16V | 290 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 207x | -188L |
1.6 16V | 290 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 181x | -188L |
1.4 | 290 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 207x | -188L |
1.3D | 290 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 232x | -188L |
1.6 | 290 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 181x | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 236x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 207x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 207x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.3D |
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 290 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -188L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 220 L | 18 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 182x | -258L |
1.4 i 16V | 220 L | 19 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 157x | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 220 L | - | 4.9x | 138x | -258L |
1.4 i 16V | 220 L | 21 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 157x | -258L |
1.2 16V | 220 L | 18 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 182x | -258L |
1.2 i | 220 L | 17 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 191x | -258L |
1.4 i | 220 L | 19 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 157x | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 138x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.2 i |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 375 L | - | 8.3x | 235x | -103L |
1.4 i 16V | 375 L | 36 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 268x | -103L |
1.4 i | 375 L | 33 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 268x | -103L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 235x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | -103L |