Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 i | 260 L | 17 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 261x | -218L |
1.6 i | 260 L | 28 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 163x | -218L |
1.0 i 16V | 260 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 261x | -218L |
1.6 i 16V | 260 L | - | 5.7x | 163x | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 i 16V | 378 L | 25 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 378x | -100L |
1.6 i | 378 L | 25 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 237x | -100L |
1.6 i 16V | 400 L | - | 8.7x | 250x | -78L |
1.7 D | 400 L | 23 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 237x | -78L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 378 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 378x |
Difference with world average | -100L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 378 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -100L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 250x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 1.7 D |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i | 390 L | 37 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 244x | -88L |
1.6 i 16V | 390 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 244x | -88L |
1.0 i | 390 L | 23 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 392x | -88L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 392x |
Difference with world average | -88L |