2020 Corvette Coupe (C8)
2020 Corvette Convertible (C8)
2014 Corvette Coupe (C7)
2014 Corvette Convertible (C7)
2014 Corvette Targa (C7)
2005 Corvette Coupe (C6)
Corvette Convertible (C6)
1999 Corvette Convertible (YY)
1997 Corvette Coupe (YY)
2000 Corvette Hardtop (YY)
1984 Corvette Coupe IV
1984 Corvette Convertible IV
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stingray 6.2 V8 | 357 L | - | - | 58x | -121L |
Vehicle | Stingray 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 357 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 58x |
Difference with world average | -121L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stingray 6.2 V8 | 357 L | - | - | 58x | -121L |
Vehicle | Stingray 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 357 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 58x |
Difference with world average | -121L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grand sport 6.2 V8 | 287 L | 74 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 47x | -191L |
Vehicle | Grand sport 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 287 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 47x |
Difference with world average | -191L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stingray 6.2 V8 | 171 L | 43 L to 1 s | 2.4x | 28x | -307L |
Grand sport 6.2 V8 | 171 L | 44 L to 1 s | 2.4x | 28x | -307L |
Vehicle | Stingray 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 171 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 28x |
Difference with world average | -307L |
Vehicle | Grand sport 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 171 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 28x |
Difference with world average | -307L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stingray 6.2 V8 | 287 L | 72 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 47x | -191L |
Vehicle | Stingray 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 287 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 47x |
Difference with world average | -191L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2i V8 32V | 634 L | 151 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 103x | +156L |
ZR1 6.2i V8 32V | 634 L | 198 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 103x | +156L |
Vehicle | 6.2i V8 32V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 634 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 151 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 103x |
Difference with world average | +156L |
Vehicle | ZR1 6.2i V8 32V |
Trunk space | 634 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 198 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 103x |
Difference with world average | +156L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.0 i V8 | 144 L | 36 L to 1 s | 2.1x | 24x | -334L |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 144 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 24x |
Difference with world average | -334L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 16V | 393 L | 79 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 69x | -85L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 393 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 79 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 69x |
Difference with world average | -85L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 16V | 335 L | 67 L to 1 s | 4.8x | 59x | -143L |
5.7 i V8 16V Z06 | 375 L | 99 L to 1 s | 5.3x | 66x | -103L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 335 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -143L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V Z06 |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 66x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 16V | 335 L | 73 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 59x | -143L |
5.7 i V8 16V Z06 | 382 L | 93 L to 1 s | 5.5x | 67x | -96L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 335 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -143L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V Z06 |
Trunk space | 382 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 67x |
Difference with world average | -96L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 | 357 L | - | 4.7x | 62x | -121L |
5.7 i V8 ZR1 | 357 L | - | 4.7x | 62x | -121L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 357 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 62x |
Difference with world average | -121L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 ZR1 |
Trunk space | 357 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 62x |
Difference with world average | -121L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 | 187 L | - | 2.5x | 33x | -291L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 187 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 33x |
Difference with world average | -291L |