cat_logo
HomeChevrolet

Equinox

Chevrolet Equinox Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Chevrolet Equinox trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 681 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.1 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 6.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 136.2 L
    • Max trunk load: 98 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5i : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0i : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6d : 6.1 L/hp (8.3 L/kW)
  • 535T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 550T : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 535T : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)
  • 550T : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 535T : 64.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 550T : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5i 847 L - 14.4x 568x +369L
    2.0i 847 L - 14.4x 424x +369L
    1.6d 847 L - 14.4x 530x +369L
    535T 431 L 46 L to 1 s 7.7x 289x -47L
    550T 431 L 58 L to 1 s 7.3x 216x -47L
    Vehicle 1.5i
    Trunk space 847 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 14.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 568x
    Difference with world average +369L
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Trunk space 847 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 14.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 424x
    Difference with world average +369L
    Vehicle 1.6d
    Trunk space 847 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 14.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 530x
    Difference with world average +369L
    Vehicle 535T
    Trunk space 431 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 289x
    Difference with world average -47L
    Vehicle 550T
    Trunk space 431 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -47L

    Quick notes on Chevrolet Equinox trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 892 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 178.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 110 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 : 4.8 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 3.6 V6 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 892 L - 12.6x 374x +414L
    3.6 V6 892 L - 12.6x 250x +414L
    Vehicle 2.4
    Trunk space 892 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 374x
    Difference with world average +414L
    Vehicle 3.6 V6
    Trunk space 892 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +414L

    Quick notes on Chevrolet Equinox trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 860 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 172 L
      • Max trunk load: 98 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.4 i V6 : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.4 i V6 : 4.78 L/km-h (2.97 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.4 i V6 : 78.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.4 i V6 860 L 100 L to 1 s 13.7x 257x +382L
    Vehicle 3.4 i V6
    Trunk space 860 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 100 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average +382L