cat_logo
HomeChevrolet

Omega

Chevrolet Omega Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Chevrolet Omega trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 475 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 95 L
    • Max trunk load: 98 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.8 i V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.8 i V6 : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.8 i V6 475 L 50 L to 1 s 6.3x 125x -3L
    Vehicle 3.8 i V6
    Trunk space 475 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 125x
    Difference with world average -3L

    Quick notes on Chevrolet Omega trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 520 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 104 L
      • Max trunk load: 84 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 i CD : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i GLS : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 2.2 i GLX : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 4.1 i CD : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 i CD : 2.48 L/km-h (1.54 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i GLS : 2.72 L/km-h (1.69 L/mph)
  • 4.1 i CD : 2.42 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 i CD : 47.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i GLS : 55.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.1 i CD : 47.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 i CD 520 L 55 L to 1 s 6.9x 175x +42L
    2.0 i GLS 520 L 46 L to 1 s 6.9x 260x +42L
    2.2 i GLX 520 L - 6.9x 237x +42L
    4.1 i CD 520 L 58 L to 1 s 6.9x 127x +42L
    Vehicle 3.0 i CD
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.0 i GLS
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.2 i GLX
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 4.1 i CD
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 127x
    Difference with world average +42L

    Quick notes on Chevrolet Omega trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 90 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 i : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 i : 2.57 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 i : 49.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 i 540 L 57 L to 1 s 7.7x 182x +62L
    Vehicle 3.0 i
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 182x
    Difference with world average +62L