Chevrolet Orlando Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Chevrolet Orlando trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 109 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 2.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 1.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 21.8 L
    • Max trunk load: 90 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.7 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 530T Ecotec : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 530T Ecotec : 0.57 L/km-h (0.35 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    530T Ecotec 109 L - 2.4x 81x -369L
    Vehicle 530T Ecotec
    Trunk space 109 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 81x
    Difference with world average -369L

    Quick notes on Chevrolet Orlando trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 95 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 2.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 13.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 TD : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 16V : 0.6 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • 1.4 turbo : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • 1.8 : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 TD : 0.46 L/km-h (0.29 L/mph)
  • 1.8 16V : 0.48 L/km-h (0.3 L/mph)
  • 1.4 turbo : 0.51 L/km-h (0.32 L/mph)
  • 1.8 : 0.55 L/km-h (0.34 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 TD : 12.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 16V : 13.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 turbo : 15.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 : 12.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 TD 89 L 8 L to 1 s 1.4x 45x -389L
    1.8 16V 89 L 8 L to 1 s 1.4x 50x -389L
    1.4 turbo 101 L 10 L to 1 s 1.7x 74x -377L
    1.8 101 L 9 L to 1 s 1.6x 56x -377L
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Trunk space 89 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 8 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 45x
    Difference with world average -389L
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Trunk space 89 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 8 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 50x
    Difference with world average -389L
    Vehicle 1.4 turbo
    Trunk space 101 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 74x
    Difference with world average -377L
    Vehicle 1.8
    Trunk space 101 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 9 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 1.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 56x
    Difference with world average -377L