Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 ECOTEC | 313 L | - | 9.2x | 224x | -165L |
Vehicle | 1.4 ECOTEC |
---|---|
Trunk space | 313 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -165L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
21 kWh | 272 L | 38 L to 1 s | - | - | -206L |
Vehicle | 21 kWh |
---|---|
Trunk space | 272 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | -206L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | 170 L | 12 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 171x | -308L |
1.2 | 170 L | 14 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 141x | -308L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 12 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -308L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | -308L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 16V | 170 L | 12 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 171x | -308L |
1.2 16V | 170 L | 15 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 141x | -308L |
Vehicle | 1.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 12 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -308L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
Trunk space | 170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | -308L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.8 i | 145 L | 8 L to 1 s | 3.8x | 182x | -333L |
1.0 i | 145 L | 12 L to 1 s | 3.8x | 146x | -333L |
Vehicle | 0.8 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 145 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 8 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -333L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
Trunk space | 145 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 12 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 146x |
Difference with world average | -333L |