Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.3 V8 | 722 L | - | - | - | +244L |
6.2 V8 | 722 L | - | - | - | +244L |
3.0d | 722 L | - | - | - | +244L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 722 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +244L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 722 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +244L |
Vehicle | 3.0d |
Trunk space | 722 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +244L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 V8 | 433 L | - | 4.4x | 70x | -45L |
5.3 EcoTec V8 | 433 L | - | 4.4x | 81x | -45L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 433 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 70x |
Difference with world average | -45L |
Vehicle | 5.3 EcoTec V8 |
Trunk space | 433 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 81x |
Difference with world average | -45L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 i V8 | 479 L | - | 4.9x | 78x | +1L |
5.3 i V8 | 479 L | - | 4.9x | 90x | +1L |
4.8 i V8 | 479 L | - | 4.9x | 100x | +1L |
6.0 V8 | 478 L | - | 5.1x | 80x | 0L |
Vehicle | 6.2 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 479 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 78x |
Difference with world average | +1L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 |
Trunk space | 479 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | +1L |
Vehicle | 4.8 i V8 |
Trunk space | 479 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 100x |
Difference with world average | +1L |
Vehicle | 6.0 V8 |
Trunk space | 478 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | 0L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.8 i V8 | 460 L | - | 4.7x | 96x | -18L |
5.3 i V8 | 460 L | - | 4.7x | 86x | -18L |
4.8 i V8 4WD | 460 L | - | 4.7x | 96x | -18L |
5.3 i V8 4WD | 460 L | 55 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 86x | -18L |
6.0 i V8 | 460 L | - | 4.7x | 77x | -18L |
Vehicle | 4.8 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 96x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 4.8 i V8 4WD |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 96x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 4WD |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 6.0 i V8 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 77x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 i V8 4WD | 1481 L | - | 13x | 258x | +1003L |
6.5 i V8 TD 4WD | 1481 L | - | 13x | 229x | +1003L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 4WD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1481 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | +1003L |
Vehicle | 6.5 i V8 TD 4WD |
Trunk space | 1481 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | +1003L |