Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 530 L | 58 L to 1 s | 10x | 389x | +52L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 389x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 356 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 223x | -122L |
1.7D | 356 L | 40 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 211x | -122L |
1.4 Turbo | 356 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 261x | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.7D |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Turbo |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -122L |