Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 AWD | 762 L | - | 8x | 218x | +284L |
3.5 i V6 FWD | 762 L | - | 8x | 218x | +284L |
3.9 i V12 | 762 L | - | 8x | 196x | +284L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 AWD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 762 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +284L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 FWD |
Trunk space | 762 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +284L |
Vehicle | 3.9 i V12 |
Trunk space | 762 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | +284L |