Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 | 462 L | - | 6.4x | 128x | -16L |
5.7 | 462 L | - | 6.4x | 82x | -16L |
S 3.6 | 462 L | - | 6.6x | 128x | -16L |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 462 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 128x |
Difference with world average | -16L |
Vehicle | 5.7 |
Trunk space | 462 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 82x |
Difference with world average | -16L |
Vehicle | S 3.6 |
Trunk space | 462 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 128x |
Difference with world average | -16L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 | 462 L | 69 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 128x | -16L |
5.7 | 462 L | 91 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 82x | -16L |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 462 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 128x |
Difference with world average | -16L |
Vehicle | 5.7 |
Trunk space | 462 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 82x |
Difference with world average | -16L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LWB 3.5 V6 | 442 L | - | 6.5x | 126x | -36L |
3.5 V6 | 442 L | 51 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 126x | -36L |
2.7 V6 | 442 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 162x | -36L |
6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 442 L | 92 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 73x | -36L |
5.7 i V8 16V | 442 L | 74 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 78x | -36L |
5.7 i V8 AWD | 442 L | - | 6.1x | 78x | -36L |
Vehicle | LWB 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 73x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 78x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 AWD |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 78x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V | 603 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 171x | +125L |
2.7 i V6 24V | 603 L | 57 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 220x | +125L |
3.0 24V CRD | 630 L | 84 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 211x | +152L |
3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 603 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 171x | +125L |
5.7 i V8 16V | 603 L | 99 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 107x | +125L |
5.7 i V8 AWD | 603 L | 99 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 107x | +125L |
6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 630 L | 131 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 104x | +152L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 603 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | +125L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 603 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | +125L |
Vehicle | 3.0 24V CRD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
Trunk space | 603 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | +125L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 16V |
Trunk space | 603 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 107x |
Difference with world average | +125L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 AWD |
Trunk space | 603 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 107x |
Difference with world average | +125L |
Vehicle | 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 131 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 104x |
Difference with world average | +152L |