Chrysler 300 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Chrysler 300 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 462 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92.4 L
    • Max trunk load: 112 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 5.7 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • S 3.6 : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.6 462 L - 6.4x 128x -16L
    5.7 462 L - 6.4x 82x -16L
    S 3.6 462 L - 6.6x 128x -16L
    Vehicle 3.6
    Trunk space 462 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 128x
    Difference with world average -16L
    Vehicle 5.7
    Trunk space 462 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 82x
    Difference with world average -16L
    Vehicle S 3.6
    Trunk space 462 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 128x
    Difference with world average -16L

    Quick notes on Chrysler 300 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 462 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 113 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 5.7 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.6 : 1.93 L/km-h (1.2 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.6 : 47.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.6 462 L 69 L to 1 s 6.4x 128x -16L
    5.7 462 L 91 L to 1 s 6.4x 82x -16L
    Vehicle 3.6
    Trunk space 462 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 128x
    Difference with world average -16L
    Vehicle 5.7
    Trunk space 462 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 91 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 82x
    Difference with world average -16L

    Quick notes on Chrysler 300 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 442 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 88.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 108 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • LWB 3.5 V6 : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 3.5 V6 : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.7 V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 5.7 i V8 AWD : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.5 V6 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.7 V6 : 2.11 L/km-h (1.31 L/mph)
  • 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 : 1.77 L/km-h (1.1 L/mph)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 1.77 L/km-h (1.1 L/mph)
  • 5.7 i V8 AWD : 1.77 L/km-h (1.1 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 : 34.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 35.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    LWB 3.5 V6 442 L - 6.5x 126x -36L
    3.5 V6 442 L 51 L to 1 s 6.5x 126x -36L
    2.7 V6 442 L 42 L to 1 s 6.5x 162x -36L
    6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 442 L 92 L to 1 s 6.1x 73x -36L
    5.7 i V8 16V 442 L 74 L to 1 s 6.1x 78x -36L
    5.7 i V8 AWD 442 L - 6.1x 78x -36L
    Vehicle LWB 3.5 V6
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 126x
    Difference with world average -36L
    Vehicle 3.5 V6
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 126x
    Difference with world average -36L
    Vehicle 2.7 V6
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 162x
    Difference with world average -36L
    Vehicle 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 92 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 73x
    Difference with world average -36L
    Vehicle 5.7 i V8 16V
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -36L
    Vehicle 5.7 i V8 AWD
    Trunk space 442 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -36L

    Quick notes on Chrysler 300 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 611 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 13.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 122.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 112 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.5 i V6 24V : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.7 i V6 24V : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 3.0 24V CRD : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 3.5 i V6 24V AWD : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 5.7 i V8 AWD : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.5 i V6 24V : 2.75 L/km-h (1.71 L/mph)
  • 2.7 i V6 24V : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • 3.0 24V CRD : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • 3.5 i V6 24V AWD : 2.75 L/km-h (1.71 L/mph)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 5.7 i V8 AWD : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 : 2.33 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.5 i V6 24V : 53.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.7 i V6 24V : 53.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.5 i V6 24V AWD : 50.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.7 i V8 16V : 48.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.7 i V8 AWD : 45.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.5 i V6 24V 603 L 69 L to 1 s 8.9x 171x +125L
    2.7 i V6 24V 603 L 57 L to 1 s 8.9x 220x +125L
    3.0 24V CRD 630 L 84 L to 1 s 8.8x 211x +152L
    3.5 i V6 24V AWD 603 L 69 L to 1 s 8.5x 171x +125L
    5.7 i V8 16V 603 L 99 L to 1 s 8.4x 107x +125L
    5.7 i V8 AWD 603 L 99 L to 1 s 8.4x 107x +125L
    6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 630 L 131 L to 1 s 8.9x 104x +152L
    Vehicle 3.5 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 603 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 171x
    Difference with world average +125L
    Vehicle 2.7 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 603 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 220x
    Difference with world average +125L
    Vehicle 3.0 24V CRD
    Trunk space 630 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 211x
    Difference with world average +152L
    Vehicle 3.5 i V6 24V AWD
    Trunk space 603 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 171x
    Difference with world average +125L
    Vehicle 5.7 i V8 16V
    Trunk space 603 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 107x
    Difference with world average +125L
    Vehicle 5.7 i V8 AWD
    Trunk space 603 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 107x
    Difference with world average +125L
    Vehicle 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8
    Trunk space 630 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 131 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average +152L