Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 i V6 24V | 530 L | 63 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 194x | +52L |
3.2 i V6 24V | 530 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 164x | +52L |
3.5 i V6 24V | 476 L | - | 7.3x | 135x | -2L |
3.5 i V6 24V Limited | 530 L | 72 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 151x | +52L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 164x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 476 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | -2L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V Limited |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 | 473 L | - | 7x | 143x | -5L |
3.5 V6 24V | 473 L | - | 7x | 134x | -5L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -5L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -5L |