Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 | 465 L | - | 7.6x | 141x | -13L |
3.8 V6 | 465 L | - | 7.6x | 123x | -13L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 123x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 | 465 L | - | 7.6x | 141x | -13L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | -13L |