Chrysler PT Cruiser Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Chrysler PT Cruiser trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 526 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 105.2 L
    • Max trunk load: 87 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.6 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i 16V Turbo : 3 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i 16V : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 2.2 16V CRD : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 2.2 CRD : 4.3 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 i 16V : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i 16V Turbo : 2.83 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i 16V : 2.99 L/km-h (1.86 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 2.95 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)
  • 2.2 16V CRD : 2.85 L/km-h (1.77 L/mph)
  • 2.2 CRD : 2.84 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V : 49.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 65x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 16V CRD : 75.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 CRD : 75.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 i 16V 520 L 50 L to 1 s 9.1x 261x +42L
    2.4 i 16V Turbo 538 L 76 L to 1 s 9.4x 221x +60L
    2.4 i 16V 538 L 55 L to 1 s 9.4x 221x +60L
    1.6 i 16V 520 L 41 L to 1 s 9.1x 325x +42L
    2.2 16V CRD 521 L 53 L to 1 s 9.1x 243x +43L
    2.2 CRD 520 L 45 L to 1 s 9.1x 242x +42L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 538 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average +60L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V
    Trunk space 538 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average +60L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 325x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.2 16V CRD
    Trunk space 521 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 243x
    Difference with world average +43L
    Vehicle 2.2 CRD
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +42L