Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 | 930 L | 103 L to 1 s | 12.2x | 258x | +452L |
3.8 V6 | 671 L | - | 8.9x | 178x | +193L |
3.3 V6 | 671 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 203x | +193L |
4.0 V6 | 671 L | - | 8.9x | 170x | +193L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 930 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | +452L |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Trunk space | 671 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | +193L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 671 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | +193L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 671 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | +193L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 | 566 L | - | 7.4x | 171x | +88L |
3.8 V6 | 566 L | 62 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 150x | +88L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 566 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | +88L |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
Trunk space | 566 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | +88L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 | 671 L | - | 8.8x | 178x | +193L |
3.3 V6 | 671 L | - | 8.8x | 203x | +193L |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 671 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | +193L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 671 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | +193L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 | 850 L | - | 11.2x | 286x | +372L |
3.3 V6 | 850 L | - | 11.2x | 257x | +372L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 850 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | +372L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 850 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | +372L |