Citroen BX Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

BX Break Phase II
BX Phase II
BX Break
BX

Quick notes on Citroen BX trunk space

- Trunk capacity for generation: 512 L
- Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.4 pcs
- Amount of average suitcases: 5.1 pcs
- Trunk space per 1 passenger: 102.4 L
- Max trunk load: 63 kg
- Interior transformation: flexible
- Horsepower to trunk space: 5.7 L to 1 hp
- Torque to trunk capacity: 3.6 to 1 Nm
- Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

19 TZI : 4.3 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

1.8 TGD : 8.5 L/hp (11.6 L/kW)

16 RS : 6.8 L/hp (9.3 L/kW)

14 E : 7.1 L/hp (9.7 L/kW)

1.9 Evasion : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)

16 TGI : 5.8 L/hp (7.9 L/kW)

19 TRS : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)

19 D : 7.2 L/hp (9.8 L/kW)

19 : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)

Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

19 TZI : 2.71 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)

1.8 TGD : 3.35 L/km-h (2.08 L/mph)

16 RS : 3.16 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)

14 E : 3.26 L/km-h (2.03 L/mph)

1.9 Evasion : 2.84 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)

16 TGI : 3.01 L/km-h (1.87 L/mph)

19 TRS : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)

19 D : 3.16 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)

19 : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 2.94 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)

Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

19 TZI : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

14 E : 62.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

1.9 Evasion : 44.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 75.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

Vehicle	Trunk space	Trunk to acceleration ratio	Trunk space to tank size	Trunk space to engine capacity	Difference with world average
19 TZI	512 L	47 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L
1.8 TGD	512 L	27 L to 1 s	7.8x	289x	+34L
16 RS	512 L	33 L to 1 s	7.8x	324x	+34L
14 E	512 L	38 L to 1 s	7.8x	376x	+34L
1.9 Evasion	512 L	48 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L
16 TGI	512 L	41 L to 1 s	7.8x	324x	+34L
19 TRS	512 L	-	7.8x	269x	+34L
19 D	512 L	37 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L
19	512 L	43 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L
1.8 TRD Turbo	512 L	45 L to 1 s	7.8x	289x	+34L

Vehicle	19 TZI
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	47 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	1.8 TGD
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	27 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	289x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	16 RS
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	33 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	324x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	14 E
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	38 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	376x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	1.9 Evasion
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	48 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	16 TGI
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	41 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	324x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	19 TRS
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	-
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	19 D
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	37 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	19
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	43 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	1.8 TRD Turbo
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	45 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	289x
Difference with world average	+34L

Quick notes on Citroen BX trunk space

- Trunk capacity for generation: 445 L
- Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.9 pcs
- Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
- Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89 L
- Max trunk load: 60 kg
- Interior transformation: flexible
- Horsepower to trunk space: 5 L to 1 hp
- Torque to trunk capacity: 3.3 to 1 Nm
- Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

16 TGI : 5.1 L/hp (6.8 L/kW)

11 : 8.1 L/hp (11.1 L/kW)

14 RE : 5.9 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)

19 TGD : 7 L/hp (9.5 L/kW)

19 GTi : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

16 RS : 5.9 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)

19 TRS : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

14 E : 6.2 L/hp (8.4 L/kW)

1.9 : 4.2 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)

14 : 7.2 L/hp (9.7 L/kW)

1.9 D : 6.3 L/hp (8.6 L/kW)

16 RE : 5.6 L/hp (7.5 L/kW)

19 TRD : 6.3 L/hp (8.6 L/kW)

17 TGD : 7.4 L/hp (10.1 L/kW)

19 TZI : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)

19 E : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)

19 D : 6.3 L/hp (8.6 L/kW)

19 GTi 16V : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)

19 GTI : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

16 TRI : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

16 TGI : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)

11 : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)

14 RE : 2.65 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)

19 TGD : 2.85 L/km-h (1.77 L/mph)

19 GTi : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)

16 RS : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)

19 TRS : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)

14 E : 2.73 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)

1.9 : 2.43 L/km-h (1.51 L/mph)

14 : 2.87 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)

1.9 D : 2.83 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)

16 RE : 2.62 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)

19 TRD : 2.73 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)

17 TGD : 2.87 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)

19 TZI : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)

19 E : 2.46 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)

19 D : 2.7 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)

19 GTi 16V : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)

19 GTI : 2.31 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)

16 TRI : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)

Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

11 : 61x (Trunk/Consumption)

14 RE : 66.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 TGD : 69.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 GTi : 46.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

14 E : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

1.9 : 52.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 TZI : 51.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 E : 52.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

19 GTi 16V : 46.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

1.8 TRD Turbo : 70.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

Vehicle	Trunk space	Trunk to acceleration ratio	Trunk space to tank size	Trunk space to engine capacity	Difference with world average
16 TGI	445 L	37 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L
11	445 L	29 L to 1 s	8.6x	396x	-33L
14 RE	445 L	35 L to 1 s	8.6x	327x	-33L
19 TGD	445 L	27 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L
19 GTi	445 L	43 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
16 RS	445 L	31 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L
19 TRS	445 L	47 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
14 E	445 L	35 L to 1 s	8.6x	327x	-33L
1.9	445 L	44 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
14	445 L	30 L to 1 s	8.6x	327x	-33L
1.9 D	445 L	25 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
16 RE	445 L	37 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L
19 TRD	445 L	30 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L
17 TGD	445 L	27 L to 1 s	8.6x	252x	-33L
19 TZI	445 L	43 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
19 E	445 L	39 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
19 D	445 L	34 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L
19 GTi 16V	445 L	54 L to 1 s	6.7x	234x	-33L
1.8 TRD Turbo	445 L	43 L to 1 s	6.7x	252x	-33L
19 GTI	445 L	-	6.7x	234x	-33L
16 TRI	445 L	42 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L

Vehicle	16 TGI
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	37 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	11
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	29 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	396x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	14 RE
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	35 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	327x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 TGD
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	27 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 GTi
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	43 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	16 RS
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	31 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 TRS
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	47 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	14 E
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	35 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	327x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	1.9
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	44 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	14
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	30 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	327x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	1.9 D
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	25 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	16 RE
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	37 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 TRD
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	30 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	17 TGD
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	27 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	252x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 TZI
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	43 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 E
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	39 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 D
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	34 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 GTi 16V
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	54 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	1.8 TRD Turbo
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	43 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	252x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 GTI
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	-
Trunk space to tank size	6.7x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	16 TRI
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	42 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L

Quick notes on Citroen BX trunk space

- Trunk capacity for generation: 512 L
- Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.4 pcs
- Amount of average suitcases: 5.1 pcs
- Trunk space per 1 passenger: 102.4 L
- Max trunk load: 60 kg
- Interior transformation: flexible
- Horsepower to trunk space: 6.2 L to 1 hp
- Torque to trunk capacity: 3.9 to 1 Nm
- Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

14 E : 7.1 L/hp (9.7 L/kW)

16 RS : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)

19 TRS : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)

19 RD : 7.9 L/hp (10.7 L/kW)

Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

14 E : 3.26 L/km-h (2.03 L/mph)

16 RS : 3.01 L/km-h (1.87 L/mph)

19 TRS : 2.81 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)

19 RD : 3.3 L/km-h (2.05 L/mph)

Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

14 E : 66.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

16 RS : 64.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

Vehicle	Trunk space	Trunk to acceleration ratio	Trunk space to tank size	Trunk space to engine capacity	Difference with world average
14 E	512 L	38 L to 1 s	7.8x	376x	+34L
16 RS	512 L	42 L to 1 s	7.8x	324x	+34L
19 TRS	512 L	51 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L
19 RD	512 L	33 L to 1 s	7.8x	269x	+34L

Vehicle	14 E
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	38 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	376x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	16 RS
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	42 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	324x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	19 TRS
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	51 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L
Vehicle	19 RD
Trunk space	512 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	33 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	7.8x
Trunk space to engine capacity	269x
Difference with world average	+34L

Quick notes on Citroen BX trunk space

- Trunk capacity for generation: 445 L
- Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.9 pcs
- Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
- Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89 L
- Max trunk load: 59 kg
- Interior transformation: flexible
- Horsepower to trunk space: 5.1 L to 1 hp
- Torque to trunk capacity: 3.3 to 1 Nm
- Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

19 Sport : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)

16 TRS : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)

19 GT : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

14 E : 6.2 L/hp (8.4 L/kW)

16 RS : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)

1.8 D : 7.4 L/hp (10.1 L/kW)

19 RD : 6.8 L/hp (9.3 L/kW)

Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

19 Sport : 2.28 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)

16 TRS : 2.62 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)

19 GT : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)

14 E : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)

16 RS : 2.53 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)

1.8 D : 2.87 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)

19 RD : 2.83 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)

Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

14 E : 62.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

Vehicle	Trunk space	Trunk to acceleration ratio	Trunk space to tank size	Trunk space to engine capacity	Difference with world average
19 Sport	445 L	52 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L
16 TRS	445 L	34 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L
19 GT	445 L	47 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L
14 E	445 L	31 L to 1 s	10.1x	327x	-33L
16 RS	445 L	42 L to 1 s	8.6x	282x	-33L
1.8 D	445 L	27 L to 1 s	8.6x	252x	-33L
19 RD	445 L	30 L to 1 s	8.6x	234x	-33L

Vehicle	19 Sport
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	52 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	16 TRS
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	34 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 GT
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	47 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	14 E
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	31 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	10.1x
Trunk space to engine capacity	327x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	16 RS
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	42 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	282x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	1.8 D
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	27 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	252x
Difference with world average	-33L
Vehicle	19 RD
Trunk space	445 L
Trunk to acceleration ratio	30 L to 1 s
Trunk space to tank size	8.6x
Trunk space to engine capacity	234x
Difference with world average	-33L