Citroen Evasion Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Citroen Evasion trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 340 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 68 L
    • Max trunk load: 93 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 HDi : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 1.8 : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 HDi : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 1.8 : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 1.82 L/km-h (1.13 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 1.74 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 HDi : 49.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 HDi 340 L 24 L to 1 s 4.3x 170x -138L
    1.8 340 L 22 L to 1 s 4.3x 193x -138L
    1.9 TD 340 L 21 L to 1 s 4.3x 178x -138L
    2.0 16V 340 L 26 L to 1 s 4.3x 170x -138L
    2.0 340 L 24 L to 1 s 4.3x 170x -138L
    2.0 Turbo 340 L 32 L to 1 s 4.3x 170x -138L
    2.1 TD 340 L 25 L to 1 s 4.3x 163x -138L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDi
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 1.8
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 178x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -138L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD
    Trunk space 340 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -138L

    Quick notes on Citroen Evasion trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 400 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 66.7 L
      • Max trunk load: 95 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 4.4 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo C.T. : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD : 2.29 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo C.T. : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 : 42.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TD : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 TD : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Turbo C.T. : 39.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 400 L 30 L to 1 s 5x 200x -78L
    1.9 TD 400 L 28 L to 1 s 5x 210x -78L
    2.1 TD 400 L 30 L to 1 s 5x 192x -78L
    2.0 Turbo C.T. 400 L 37 L to 1 s 5x 200x -78L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo C.T.
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average -78L