Citroen Saxo Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Citroen Saxo trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 280 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.2 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 2.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 56 L
    • Max trunk load: 52 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.6 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 SX : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.0 X : 6.2 L/hp (8.5 L/kW)
  • 1.1 X,SX : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • 1.5 D : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 VTL,VTR : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i VTS : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 VTS : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 SX : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.0 X : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 1.1 X,SX : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 1.5 D : 1.77 L/km-h (1.1 L/mph)
  • 1.6 VTL,VTR : 1.5 L/km-h (0.93 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i VTS : 1.45 L/km-h (0.9 L/mph)
  • 1.6 VTS : 1.37 L/km-h (0.85 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.0 X : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.1 X,SX : 45.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 VTS : 37.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 SX 280 L 23 L to 1 s 6.2x 206x -198L
    1.0 X 280 L 15 L to 1 s 6.2x 294x -198L
    1.1 X,SX 280 L 20 L to 1 s 6.2x 249x -198L
    1.5 D 280 L 16 L to 1 s 6.2x 183x -198L
    1.6 VTL,VTR 280 L 25 L to 1 s 6.2x 176x -198L
    1.6 i VTS 280 L 28 L to 1 s 6.2x 176x -198L
    1.6 VTS 280 L 34 L to 1 s 6.2x 176x -198L
    Vehicle 1.4 SX
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 206x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.0 X
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 294x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.1 X,SX
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 20 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.5 D
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.6 VTL,VTR
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 176x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.6 i VTS
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 176x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.6 VTS
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 176x
    Difference with world average -198L