Citroen XM Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Citroen XM trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
    • Max trunk load: 92 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.5 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 3.3 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 2.5 TD : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 V6 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 2.42 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 2.5 TD : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 V6 480 L 46 L to 1 s 6x 162x +2L
    2.1 TD 12V 480 L 39 L to 1 s 6x 230x +2L
    2.0 Turbo 480 L 48 L to 1 s 6x 240x +2L
    2.0 i 16V 480 L 43 L to 1 s 6x 240x +2L
    2.5 TD 480 L 39 L to 1 s 6x 196x +2L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 162x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 230x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 196x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Citroen XM trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 455 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 91 L
      • Max trunk load: 88 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 2.5 TD : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 24V : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 V6 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 2.37 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 2.5 TD : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 24V : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 V6 24V : 39.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 V6 455 L 57 L to 1 s 5.7x 154x -23L
    2.1 TD 12V 455 L 37 L to 1 s 5.7x 218x -23L
    2.0 Turbo 455 L 52 L to 1 s 5.7x 228x -23L
    2.0 i 16V 455 L 44 L to 1 s 5.7x 228x -23L
    2.5 TD 455 L 40 L to 1 s 5.7x 186x -23L
    3.0 V6 24V 455 L 55 L to 1 s 5.7x 154x -23L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 24V
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -23L

    Quick notes on Citroen XM trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 720 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 16 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 7.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 144 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 i : 6 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 8.8 L/hp (12 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT : 5 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 6.6 L/hp (9 L/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 i : 3.75 L/km-h (2.33 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 4.29 L/km-h (2.67 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT : 3.56 L/km-h (2.21 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 3.79 L/km-h (2.36 L/mph)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 3.32 L/km-h (2.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i : 79.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 104.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i Turbo CT : 79.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 109.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 72.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 i 720 L 58 L to 1 s 9x 360x +242L
    2.1 D 12V 720 L 40 L to 1 s 9x 337x +242L
    2.0 i Turbo CT 720 L - 9x 360x +242L
    2.1 TD 12V 720 L 59 L to 1 s 9x 345x +242L
    3.0 i V6 720 L 69 L to 1 s 9x 242x +242L
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Trunk space 720 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 360x
    Difference with world average +242L
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Trunk space 720 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 337x
    Difference with world average +242L
    Vehicle 2.0 i Turbo CT
    Trunk space 720 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 360x
    Difference with world average +242L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Trunk space 720 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 345x
    Difference with world average +242L
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Trunk space 720 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +242L

    Quick notes on Citroen XM trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 83 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 i TCT : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 6.6 L/hp (9 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 i TCT : 2.55 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i : 2.69 L/km-h (1.67 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 3.12 L/km-h (1.94 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 2.81 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 2.43 L/km-h (1.51 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i TCT : 60.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i : 61.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D 12V : 80.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 TD 12V : 81.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 i V6 24V : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 i V6 : 56.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 i TCT 540 L 58 L to 1 s 6.8x 270x +62L
    2.0 i 540 L 48 L to 1 s 6.8x 270x +62L
    2.1 D 12V 540 L 32 L to 1 s 6.8x 253x +62L
    2.1 TD 12V 540 L 44 L to 1 s 6.8x 259x +62L
    3.0 i V6 24V 540 L 66 L to 1 s 6.8x 182x +62L
    3.0 i V6 540 L 59 L to 1 s 6.8x 182x +62L
    Vehicle 2.0 i TCT
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.1 D 12V
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 253x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 259x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 182x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 3.0 i V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 182x
    Difference with world average +62L