cat_logo
HomeCitroen

Xsara

Citroen Xsara Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Citroen Xsara trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 408 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.1 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 81.6 L
    • Max trunk load: 65 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 16V : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 HDi : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16 V : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.4 HDi : 6 L/hp (8.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i : 5.4 L/hp (7.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 VTS 16V : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 16V : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • 2.0 HDi : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 16 V : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.4 HDi : 2.49 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i : 2.33 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 2.0 VTS 16V : 1.85 L/km-h (1.15 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 HDi : 78.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i 16 V : 59.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 16V 408 L 45 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    2.0 HDi 408 L 38 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    1.6 i 16 V 408 L 39 L to 1 s 7.6x 257x -70L
    1.4 HDi 408 L 26 L to 1 s 7.6x 292x -70L
    1.4 i 408 L 30 L to 1 s 7.6x 300x -70L
    1.6 i 408 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 257x -70L
    1.8 i 408 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 232x -70L
    1.8 i 16V 408 L 40 L to 1 s 7.6x 232x -70L
    1.9 D 408 L 25 L to 1 s 7.6x 218x -70L
    2.0 VTS 16V 408 L 49 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDi
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16 V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.4 HDi
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.4 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 VTS 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L

    Quick notes on Citroen Xsara trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 550 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 110 L
      • Max trunk load: 77 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 : 6.3 L/hp (8.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 HDI FAP : 5 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)
  • 1.8 16V : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 HDI : 6.1 L/hp (8.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 : 3.27 L/km-h (2.03 L/mph)
  • 1.6 HDI FAP : 3.01 L/km-h (1.87 L/mph)
  • 1.8 16V : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 2.86 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)
  • 2.0 HDI : 3.14 L/km-h (1.95 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 16V : 71.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V : 64x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 HDI : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 550 L 38 L to 1 s 10x 347x +72L
    1.6 HDI FAP 550 L 49 L to 1 s 9.2x 353x +72L
    1.8 16V 550 L 51 L to 1 s 10x 312x +72L
    2.0 16V 550 L 47 L to 1 s 10x 275x +72L
    2.0 HDI 550 L 44 L to 1 s 9.2x 275x +72L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 347x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 1.6 HDI FAP
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 353x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 312x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 275x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 275x
    Difference with world average +72L

    Quick notes on Citroen Xsara trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 408 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 81.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 66 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 HDi : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i : 5.4 L/hp (7.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 HDi : 6 L/hp (8.2 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 5.8 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 4.5 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 HDi : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 2.07 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i : 2.33 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)
  • 1.4 HDi : 2.49 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 HDi : 77x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i 16V : 59.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V : 53x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 i : 60.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 HDi : 90.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 D : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 75.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 HDi 408 L 38 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    1.6 i 16V 408 L 39 L to 1 s 7.6x 257x -70L
    2.0 16V 408 L 43 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    1.4 i 408 L 30 L to 1 s 7.6x 300x -70L
    1.6 i 408 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 257x -70L
    1.4 HDi 408 L 26 L to 1 s 7.6x 292x -70L
    1.8 i 408 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 232x -70L
    1.8 i 16V 408 L 40 L to 1 s 7.6x 232x -70L
    1.9 D 408 L 25 L to 1 s 7.6x 218x -70L
    2.0 HDI 90 408 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 204x -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDi
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.4 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.4 HDi
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 90
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L

    Quick notes on Citroen Xsara trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 517 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.5 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 103.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 i : 6.9 L/hp (9.4 L/kW)
  • 1.4 HDi : 7.6 L/hp (10.3 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16 V : 4.7 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 7.4 L/hp (10.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 HDi : 4.7 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 i : 2.95 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)
  • 1.4 HDi : 3.15 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i : 2.87 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i : 2.84 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 16 V : 2.64 L/km-h (1.64 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.64 L/km-h (1.64 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 2.51 L/km-h (1.56 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 3.19 L/km-h (1.98 L/mph)
  • 2.0 HDi : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)
  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 2.86 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 HDI 90 : 105.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 i 517 L 37 L to 1 s 9.6x 380x +39L
    1.4 HDi 517 L 36 L to 1 s 9.6x 370x +39L
    1.6 i 517 L 40 L to 1 s 9.6x 326x +39L
    1.8 i 517 L 40 L to 1 s 9.6x 293x +39L
    1.6 i 16 V 517 L 49 L to 1 s 9.6x 326x +39L
    1.8 i 16V 517 L 49 L to 1 s 9.6x 293x +39L
    2.0 16V 517 L 53 L to 1 s 9.6x 259x +39L
    1.9 D 517 L 31 L to 1 s 9.6x 277x +39L
    2.0 HDi 517 L 46 L to 1 s 9.6x 259x +39L
    2.0 HDI 90 517 L 41 L to 1 s 9.6x 259x +39L
    Vehicle 1.4 i
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 380x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.4 HDi
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 370x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 326x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 293x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16 V
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 326x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 293x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 259x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDi
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 259x
    Difference with world average +39L
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 90
    Trunk space 517 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 259x
    Difference with world average +39L