Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 408 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
2.0 HDi | 408 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
1.6 i 16 V | 408 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 257x | -70L |
1.4 HDi | 408 L | 26 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 292x | -70L |
1.4 i | 408 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 300x | -70L |
1.6 i | 408 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 257x | -70L |
1.8 i | 408 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 232x | -70L |
1.8 i 16V | 408 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 232x | -70L |
1.9 D | 408 L | 25 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 218x | -70L |
2.0 VTS 16V | 408 L | 49 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16 V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.4 HDi |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 VTS 16V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 550 L | 38 L to 1 s | 10x | 347x | +72L |
1.6 HDI FAP | 550 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 353x | +72L |
1.8 16V | 550 L | 51 L to 1 s | 10x | 312x | +72L |
2.0 16V | 550 L | 47 L to 1 s | 10x | 275x | +72L |
2.0 HDI | 550 L | 44 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 275x | +72L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 550 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 347x |
Difference with world average | +72L |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDI FAP |
Trunk space | 550 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 353x |
Difference with world average | +72L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 550 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 312x |
Difference with world average | +72L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 550 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +72L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Trunk space | 550 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +72L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 HDi | 408 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
1.6 i 16V | 408 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 257x | -70L |
2.0 16V | 408 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
1.4 i | 408 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 300x | -70L |
1.6 i | 408 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 257x | -70L |
1.4 HDi | 408 L | 26 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 292x | -70L |
1.8 i | 408 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 232x | -70L |
1.8 i 16V | 408 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 232x | -70L |
1.9 D | 408 L | 25 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 218x | -70L |
2.0 HDI 90 | 408 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 204x | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.4 HDi |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 90 |
Trunk space | 408 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -70L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 i | 517 L | 37 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 380x | +39L |
1.4 HDi | 517 L | 36 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 370x | +39L |
1.6 i | 517 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 326x | +39L |
1.8 i | 517 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 293x | +39L |
1.6 i 16 V | 517 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 326x | +39L |
1.8 i 16V | 517 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 293x | +39L |
2.0 16V | 517 L | 53 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 259x | +39L |
1.9 D | 517 L | 31 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 277x | +39L |
2.0 HDi | 517 L | 46 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 259x | +39L |
2.0 HDI 90 | 517 L | 41 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 259x | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 380x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.4 HDi |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 370x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16 V |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +39L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI 90 |
Trunk space | 517 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +39L |