Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi | 573 L | 49 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 392x | +95L |
1.0 SCe | 573 L | 39 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 574x | +95L |
0.9 TCe | 573 L | 55 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 638x | +95L |
1.0 TCe | 573 L | - | 11.5x | 574x | +95L |
1.0 ECO-G | 573 L | - | 11.5x | 574x | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 392x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.0 SCe |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 638x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.0 TCe |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.0 ECO-G |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TCe | 573 L | 49 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 638x | +95L |
1.5 dCi | 573 L | 48 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 392x | +95L |
1.0 TCe | 573 L | - | 11.5x | 574x | +95L |
1.0 ECO-G | 573 L | - | 11.5x | 574x | +95L |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe |
---|---|
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 638x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 392x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.0 TCe |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.0 ECO-G |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TCe 90 CP | 510 L | - | 10.2x | 568x | +32L |
1.5 dCi | 510 L | 46 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 349x | +32L |
0.9 TCe | 510 L | 49 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 568x | +32L |
1.0 12V | 510 L | - | 10.2x | 511x | +32L |
1.0 SCe | 510 L | 36 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 511x | +32L |
1.0 ECO-G | 510 L | - | 10.2x | 511x | +32L |
1.5 Blue dCi | 510 L | 45 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 349x | +32L |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe 90 CP |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 568x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 568x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.0 12V |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 511x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.0 SCe |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 511x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.0 ECO-G |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 511x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.5 Blue dCi |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 510 L | 37 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 444x | +32L |
1.5 dCi | 510 L | 37 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 349x | +32L |
0.9 Tce | 510 L | 49 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 568x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 444x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 0.9 Tce |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 568x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 Tce | 573 L | 55 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 638x | +95L |
1.5 dCi | 573 L | 41 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 392x | +95L |
1.2 | 573 L | 42 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 499x | +95L |
1.5 dci | 573 L | 41 L to 1 s | 11.5x | 392x | +95L |
Vehicle | 0.9 Tce |
---|---|
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 638x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 392x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 499x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dci |
Trunk space | 573 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 392x |
Difference with world average | +95L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi | 200 L | 12 L to 1 s | 4x | 137x | -278L |
1.4i | 200 L | 16 L to 1 s | 4x | 144x | -278L |
1.6 i | 200 L | 16 L to 1 s | 4x | 125x | -278L |
1.6i 16V | 200 L | 21 L to 1 s | 4x | 125x | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 12 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 137x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 125x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 125x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 700 L | 63 L to 1 s | 14x | 438x | +222L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 700 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 438x |
Difference with world average | +222L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 i | 510 L | 41 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 367x | +32L |
1.6 i | 510 L | 47 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 319x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 367x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 319x |
Difference with world average | +32L |