Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i | 560 L | 46 L to 1 s | 11.2x | 280x | +82L |
1.8 i | 560 L | 53 L to 1 s | 11.2x | 312x | +82L |
1.5 i 16V | 560 L | 46 L to 1 s | 11.2x | 374x | +82L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 280x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 312x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 374x |
Difference with world average | +82L |