Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i R6 24V | 480 L | - | 7.4x | 241x | +2L |
2.5i R6 24V | 480 L | - | 7.4x | 193x | +2L |
2.5i R6 24V | 480 L | - | 7.4x | 193x | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.0i R6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.5i R6 24V |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.5i R6 24V |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | +2L |