Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2i V6 24V | 465 L | 55 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 145x | -13L |
2.0 CRDI | 465 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 234x | -13L |
2.4i 16V | 465 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 193x | -13L |
Vehicle | 3.2i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDI |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -13L |