Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V | 452 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 192x | -26L |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 452 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -26L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 V6 | 370 L | - | 6.2x | 148x | -108L |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -108L |