Dodge Caliber Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Dodge Caliber trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 524 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 131 L
    • Max trunk load: 87 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 i 16V : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 i 16V : 2.14 L/km-h (1.33 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 i 16V : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 i 16V 524 L 82 L to 1 s 10.2x 222x +46L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V
    Trunk space 524 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average +46L

    Quick notes on Dodge Caliber trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 524 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 104.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 86 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 i 16V : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V CRD : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 i 16V : 2.14 L/km-h (1.33 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V CRD : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 2.94 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 i 16V : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 i 16V 524 L 82 L to 1 s 10.1x 222x +46L
    2.0 16V CRD 524 L 52 L to 1 s 10.1x 266x +46L
    2.0 i 16V 524 L 49 L to 1 s 10.1x 262x +46L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V
    Trunk space 524 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average +46L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V CRD
    Trunk space 524 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 266x
    Difference with world average +46L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 524 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 262x
    Difference with world average +46L