Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRT 6.4 V8 | 487 L | - | 5.2x | 76x | +9L |
3.6 V6 | 490 L | - | 5.3x | 136x | +12L |
5.7 V8 | 490 L | - | 5.3x | 87x | +12L |
Vehicle | SRT 6.4 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 487 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 76x |
Difference with world average | +9L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 | 490 L | - | 5.3x | 136x | +12L |
5.7 V8 | 490 L | - | 5.3x | 87x | +12L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 i V6 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 144x | +54L |
4.7 i V8 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 113x | +54L |
4.7 i V8 AWD | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 113x | +54L |
5.7 i V8 AWD | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 94x | +54L |
5.7 i V8 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 94x | +54L |
Vehicle | 3.7 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 4.7 i V8 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 4.7 i V8 AWD |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 AWD |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 5.7 i V8 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.7 i V8 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 113x | +54L |
3.9 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 136x | +54L |
4.7 i V8 AWD | 535 L | 62 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 114x | +57L |
5.2 AWD | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 102x | +54L |
5.2 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 102x | +54L |
5.9 | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 90x | +54L |
5.9 SLT AWD | 532 L | - | 5.6x | 90x | +54L |
Vehicle | 4.7 i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 3.9 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 4.7 i V8 AWD |
Trunk space | 535 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 114x |
Difference with world average | +57L |
Vehicle | 5.2 AWD |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 102x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 5.2 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 102x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 5.9 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 5.9 SLT AWD |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 90x |
Difference with world average | +54L |