Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 i V6 24V SE | 521 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 190x | +43L |
3.5 i V6 24V ES | 521 L | 64 L to 1 s | 8x | 148x | +43L |
3.2 i V6 24V ES | 521 L | 64 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 162x | +43L |
3.5 i V6 24V R/T | 521 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 148x | +43L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V SE |
---|---|
Trunk space | 521 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | +43L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V ES |
Trunk space | 521 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | +43L |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V ES |
Trunk space | 521 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | +43L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V R/T |
Trunk space | 521 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | +43L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 i V6 | 473 L | - | 7x | 143x | -5L |
3.5 i V6 24V | 473 L | - | 7x | 134x | -5L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -5L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -5L |