Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 L | 454 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 166x | -24L |
2.0 | 445 L | - | 7.3x | 223x | -33L |
2.4 | 454 L | - | 7.4x | 187x | -24L |
Vehicle | 2.7 L |
---|---|
Trunk space | 454 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 166x |
Difference with world average | -24L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 454 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -24L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V | 454 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 193x | -24L |
3.0i V6 24V R/T | 454 L | 55 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 153x | -24L |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 454 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -24L |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V R/T |
Trunk space | 454 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -24L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 445 L | - | 7.4x | 223x | -33L |
2.4 | 445 L | - | 7.4x | 183x | -33L |
2.5 | 445 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 178x | -33L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | -33L |