Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 THP | 468 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 293x | -10L |
2.0 | 325 L | 40 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 163x | -153L |
2.0 BlueHDi | 468 L | 54 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 234x | -10L |
1.6 BlueHDi | 468 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 300x | -10L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
---|---|
Trunk space | 468 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | -10L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 325 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -153L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 468 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -10L |
Vehicle | 1.6 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 468 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | -10L |