FAW Besturn B70 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on FAW Besturn B70 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 522 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 104.4 L
    • Max trunk load: 91 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.1 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 1.8 T : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)
  • 1.8 T : 2.43 L/km-h (1.51 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 522 L - 9x 261x +44L
    1.8 T 522 L 51 L to 1 s 9x 291x +44L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 522 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +44L
    Vehicle 1.8 T
    Trunk space 522 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 291x
    Difference with world average +44L

    Quick notes on FAW Besturn B70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.3 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 3.3 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.3 : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.3 480 L - 7.5x 212x +2L
    2.0 480 L - 7.5x 240x +2L
    Vehicle 2.3
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L